G'day all,
Hmmm, guess you can't edit the subject!
What I meant was stems.
With regard to the "new" indicators (Rear) for a Z900-A4, as available on ePay, Z-Power etc. Anyone know how accurate to original they are? And does the original Stanley lens fit on them? Mine a buggered from thanks to the chromers handiwork.
Thanks
Glenn
(Edited by Sorf at 2:06 am on Aug. 2, 2006)
Hello Guest User,
Please feel free to have a look around the forum but be aware that as an unregistered guest you can't see all of it and you can't post.
To access these 'Registered Users Only' areas simply register and login.
Please feel free to have a look around the forum but be aware that as an unregistered guest you can't see all of it and you can't post.
To access these 'Registered Users Only' areas simply register and login.
Indicator meatlwork
Moderators: KeithZ1R, chrisu, paul doran, Taffus
I too found that the idicators dont take to kindly to re chrome, i think its was they call monkey chrome and is liable to show up imperfections. I went for genuine kawa items which are still available and look far superior to the after market repro ones in quality and finish. Ps I managed to get my local kawa dealer to give me a 30% discount on any Z1 bit I ordered which made genuine items much more attractive.
Being a metal poisher by trade and working in
the plating trade can shed some light on this.
On a lot of older vehicles like a Z the indicators
are made of zinc die-cast (monkey metal)while
when new they plate fine when they are rechromed (as with
anything thats being rechromed) the old plating has to be chemicaly stripped
off and the bare metal surface highly polished.
And this is where the problem is zinc die-cast corrodes
away underneath the plating so when you strip the old
plating off you realy dont know what sort of condition
the metal surface is like, my self personally im going
to replace my indicators
with new ones cuz i know what a ***** monkey metal is.
By the way Z fuel caps are made of the same stuff
the plating trade can shed some light on this.
On a lot of older vehicles like a Z the indicators
are made of zinc die-cast (monkey metal)while
when new they plate fine when they are rechromed (as with
anything thats being rechromed) the old plating has to be chemicaly stripped
off and the bare metal surface highly polished.
And this is where the problem is zinc die-cast corrodes
away underneath the plating so when you strip the old
plating off you realy dont know what sort of condition
the metal surface is like, my self personally im going
to replace my indicators
with new ones cuz i know what a ***** monkey metal is.
By the way Z fuel caps are made of the same stuff
So, maybe not aftermarket ones eh? Guess I'd better start saving again!
The chromer did say they a bugger to do, so I was warned. Looks as though they had a field with the linisher and have worn the rim where the lens fits down to paper thickness and it's all bent and buckled round the edge. Just glad I only sent the rear ones off.
The chromer did say they a bugger to do, so I was warned. Looks as though they had a field with the linisher and have worn the rim where the lens fits down to paper thickness and it's all bent and buckled round the edge. Just glad I only sent the rear ones off.
This is what usually happens when you try and get a perfect finish with die-cast it ends up paper thin, the only way to do it realy is polish as best you can then put a heavy deposit of copper plating on it then polish the copper plating blending any pitting as you go but even this wont guarantee a perfect finish and is time consuming hence costly.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests